Peak of Flight #63: How To Use Paper to Make Centering Rings for High-Power Rockets
Apogee Components' Peak of Flight newsletter, issue 63. Date: undated; published between 2000 and 2005 (from the neighbouring dated issues).
I S S U E
N
E
W
S
L
E
6 3
T
T
E
R
Paper Centering Rings for HPR.
By Tim Van Milligan
In the last issue of this e-zine, I talked about the neat advantages of paper. (Newsletter 62) In the same theme, this
time I thought I'd talk about using paper centering rings for
high power rockets.
I know what your thinking... "Paper? Are you nuts?"
Again and again, I hear people say that for high power
rockets, you need to use plywood or fiberglass for the centering rings. In fact, I'm asked all the time about the rings for the
Saturn V kit. Some people seem to think that if it doesn't have
plywood rings, that it is somehow inferior.
The Saturn V is a big model. It has a single 29mm motor
mount centered in a 5.65 inch diameter tube. This is a pretty
good size ring!
Let me tell you that the Saturn V kit will use a heavy
paper-cardstock for the centering rings. IT WORKS GREAT!
And I've launched it on some big motors, and the rings have
performed just fine.
The reason it works is that the flat paper disk are not the
main structural part of the of motor mount. The centering rings
have been reinforced in such a way that they actually carry
only a small part of the forces of the rocket thrust. The main
loads are carried by the reinforcing members that were engineered into the rocket.
Our goal with this design was to use the disks to concentrically center the engine mount tube inside the big diameter
tube; which is why they are called "centering" rings, and not
"thrust" rings. We tried to remove the thrust loads from the
rings so that they could be made as light as possible, and from
an inexpensive material.
Additionally, the only other purpose they server is to provide a gas seal to allow the ejection charge to function adequately. This allows the parachute to be ejected with good
vigorousness.
What are the reinforcing members that give the rings their
strength?
The first is vertically mounted gussets. These are radially
spaced around the ring, and glued directly to the ring to stiffen
it up. But they do far more than stiffen the ring. They transfer
nearly all the forces from the engine mount tube to the walls
of the rocket.
The amount of force that they can take is incredible. I
haven't done a stress analysis of the arrangement, but my guess
is they add 100 times to the strength of the ring.
If you've used through-the-wall fins that attach to the engine mount tube; then you've used this strength-building technique. It is very common among high power builders. But
people don't realize that it not only stiffens the fins up, but
that it also removes the stress from the rings. So the rings can
be made thinner and out of lighter materials like paper.
The other reinforcing member incorporated into the Saturn V kit is a thrust ring on the inside wall of the large tube.
You probably use thrust rings all the time just in front of the
motor to transfer the force loads from the engine to the motor
mount tube. Our second thrust ring on the inside of the big
tube allows the forces to be transferred from the rings and the
gussets to the walls of the tube. In essence, it removes the load
1130 Elkton Drive, Suite A
Colorado Springs, CO 80907 USA
www.ApogeeRockets.com
orders @ApogeeRockets.com
phone 719-535-9335 fax 719-534-9050
Page
1
P
E
A
K
O
F
from the typical glue joint around the perimeter of the rings.
The rings aren't pushing on a thin glue joint, but against a ring
along the wall.
These reinforcing techniques are not new. They've been
around for a long time. In fact, you can find pictures of them
in the book: "Model Rocket Design and Construction." (http:/
/www.apogeerockets.com/design_book.asp)
I know that most modelers know about these techniques.
But they seem to believe that they need to build bullet-proof
models. They go overboard and they use heavier and more
expensive materials. The main drawback of this is that "bullet-proof" is not "safer." It is heavier; requiring a bigger and
more expensive motor to lift. Plus it falls faster; meaning it
needs a bigger and more expensive parachute to bring it down.
And if the rocket crashes, it can cause a lot of damage to whatever it hits. I'd rather see a rocket that is lightweight and can
absorb its own impact energy.
In conclusion, just because your rocket may be made out
of paper does not mean it isn't strong. It is possible to make
6
Degrees Of
Freedom
splash
F
L
I
G
H
T
very-very strong and durable centering rings out of paper.
People have given paper a bad reputation, but only because they haven't designed the model properly. If the disk
has to carry the entire load of the motor's thrust, then it is
likely to fail by delaminating, tearing, or become unglued.
But if you remove the loads from the ring and transfer them to
structural members; you can get a powerfully strong engine
mount that has the benefit of being ultra light weight!
About the Author:
Tim Van Milligan is the owner of Apogee Components
(http://www.apogeerockets.com) and the curator of the rocketry education web site: http://www.apogeerockets.com/education. He is also the author of the books: "Model Rocket Design and Construction," "69 Simple Science Fair Projects with
Model Rockets: Aeronautics" and publisher of the FREE ezine newsletter about model rockets. You can subscribe to the
e-zine at the Apogee Components web site, or sending an email
to: [email protected] with "SUBSCRIBE" as the subject line of the message.
What does this mean to you?
6 Degrees of Freedom software means it can find the
position of the rocket in the X (vertical), Y (downrange), and Z
(cross-wind) coordinates, as well as Pitch, Yaw, and Roll. Splash
is the first affordable rocketry simulation program that can
perform this complex scenereo. This means it can give you an
accurate indication of where your high altitude flights will land.
You tell Splash what conditions might vary during the
flight, such as wind speed vs altitude; or the failure
likelihood of the parachute failing. You can vary 18 different
variables during the flight, and Splash will give you a plot of
the likely landing zone. If you're flying sub-orbital flights,
then you'll need this data to get permission from the FAA to
launch your rocket. Right now, Splash is the only software
that can do this.
Order a copy today; or for more
information, visit:
www.ApogeeRockets.com/splash.asp
©2002 Hall Consulting
About this Newsletter
You can subscribe “FREE” to receive this e-zine at the Apogee Components web
site (www.ApogeeRockets.com), or sending an email to: [email protected]
with "SUBSCRIBE" as the subject line of the message.
A P O G E E
Page 2
R O C K E T S