Peak of Flight #607: Corkscrew Parachute Descents (And what to do about them)
Apogee Components' Peak of Flight newsletter, issue 607 (2023-08-29). Also in this issue: Escape Velocity Rocket Plan.
www.ApogeeRockets.com
4960 Northpark Dr, Colorado Springs CO 80918
Ph# 719-535-9335
Issue 607 / August 29th 2023
In This Issue:
Corkscrew Parachute
Descents
(And what to do
about them)
Also In
This Issue:
Escape Velocity
Rocket Plan
https://www.apogeerockets.com/Peak-of-Flight-Rocket-Plans
Issue 607 / August 29th 2023
Corkscrew Parachute Descents
(And what to do about them)
By Dave Flanagan
Introduction
We’ve all seen it, particularly with low power rocket
(LPR) models. The launch is perfect, the coast phase is
straight and true, and then the ejection charge fires and
the parachute deploys. For a couple seconds the descent
is stable, but then the entire assembly starts to swing wildly around in circles, with the airframe swinging way out on
its shock cord. It “corkscrews” for the rest of the descent
and finally slams into the ground. If the rocket lands in the
tall grass there may be no damage. But what if it lands on
desert hardpan or on the school parking lot? Fins, landing
legs, escape towers, paint, and even decals can all pay a
heavy price. So why does this happen and, more importantly, what can we do about it?
Corkscrew descents may happen for a combination of
reasons. One is the type of parachute used in LPR models. (These are sometimes called “kit chutes.”) Kit chutes
belong to a category of parachutes called “flat circulars.”
Flat circular parachutes are unique. When heavily loaded
(small parachute, heavy payload), they may oscillate a bit
during descent. When lightly loaded (large parachute, light
payload) they tend to glide aimlessly around the sky [1].
Generally LPR kit chutes are very lightly loaded. For LPR
models the standard recommendation is no more than one
gram of mass per ten square centimeters of parachute
area [2]. By contrast, larger “full scale” flat circular chutes
like the 28 foot military personnel parachute can be loaded
to twice that, and many military cargo chutes are loaded
to over three times that value! These more heavily loaded
chutes may oscillate, but they don’t skate around the sky
like our more lightly loaded kit chutes do.
Another contributing factor may be that the standard
kit parachute is often very poorly built. The suspension
lines are too short and usually the line lengths vary too
much. I measured the suspension lines of three 12” Estes
kit chutes shipped as complete assemblies. Line lengths
on the three parachutes averaged 27.9 cm. Most authorities suggest a minimum line length of one parachute
diameter which in this case was 32 cm across the flats
[2]. Also, the variation in line length ranged from 2.8% to
About this Newsletter
You can subscribe to recieve this e-zine
FREE at the Apogee Components website
www.ApogeeComponents.com, or by
clicking the link here Newsletter Sign-Up
7.1% of the grand average. Consistent line length is very
important in full scale parachutes and very likely ours as
well. Note the Apollo parachutes were allowed a difference in line length of 0.35% at most [1]. Contrast this with
the 2.8% (best case) measured here.
Table 1. Line lengths of three Estes 12” “kit chutes.”
Another factor that may contribute to corkscrew
descents is the payload. In full scale applications (military
cargo chutes, etc.) the payload is relatively heavy, compact, and generally remains directly under the parachute
that supports it. It is relatively unaffected by the air flowing
past it. The parachute, its payload, and the entire system’s
center of gravity are all aligned vertically. However, with
our rockets the airframe dangles at the end of the shock
cord, it is very light, and it has a very large drag area due
in a large part to the fins.
So what happens? I suspect the following: After the
parachute opens and the descent begins, the parachute,
which as noted likes to glide, starts to do so. The comparatively lightweight airframe, with its high drag fins, falls
behind. The parachute “leads” and the airframe “trails.”
Newsletter Staff
Writer: Dave Flanagan
Editor: Michelle Mason
Layout: Sky Luther
Continued on Page 3
Page 2
Issue 607 / August 29th 2023
Corkscrew Parachute Descents
(And what to do about them)
By Dave Flanagan
This tilts the entire assembly from the vertical. The center of gravity of the system is no longer directly under the
parachute. This creates what engineers call a “moment
arm” (lever) in a horizontal plane (see figure 1). If the
chute is well built and there is no turbulence the glide can
be steep but more or less benign. However if the chute
is poorly built (which as noted many are) it can initiate a
turn from the glide path. Turbulence from the nose cone,
which is normally rigged very close to the parachute, may
also cause a turn. Once a turn from the glide path begins
the system starts to rotate around the system’s center of
gravity. Seen from above the parachute would appear to
be gliding around in small circles with the system center of
gravity unmoving in the center of the circle. Centrifugal acceleration then makes the airframe swing out which tilts the
assembly from vertical even more. There appears to be no
mechanism for damping this motion. Eventually a steady
state corkscrew descent is established.
Any situation that results in the parachute not being
aligned directly over the system center of gravity raises
the potential for corkscrew descents.
Test Flights
I personally do not have problems with corkscrew
descents since I never use kit chutes “out of the box” nor
do I assemble them according to the directions. However, I launched a few test flights using several modified
Baby Berthas (three fins instead of four) powered by
A8-3 motors just to see what I could learn. For one flight
I installed the kit chute on the nose cone according to
the directions. The parachute established a somewhat
steep but straight glide with no corkscrew tendency during
descent. On another flight I simulated poor construction
by loosening the lines at the nose cone and making them
more uneven. This flight definitely exhibited a corkscrew
descent all the way into the ground (see figure 2). Then I
flew a parachute I had assembled at home. In this case I
had stripped the short and uneven lines from the kit chute
canopy and replaced them with longer, even lines, and a
short bridle. This parachute established a strait and rather
stately glide with no tendency to corkscrew.
Figure 2. A corkscrew descent caused by simulated poor
parachute construction/installation.
Figure 1. When gliding causes the system to tilt, the
parachute is no longer positioned over the system center of
gravity. This creates a “moment arm.” Any tendency of the
chute to turn into or out of the page causes the system to
rotate around its center of gravity, initiating the corkscrew
tendency.
Continued on Page 4
Page 3
Issue 607 / August 29th 2023
Corkscrew Parachute Descents
(And what to do about them)
By Dave Flanagan
cone. Use a bridle or riser of at least one parachute diameter between the nose cone and where the parachute lines
come together. It is not proven but this may prevent any
turbulent wake trailing behind the nose cone from affecting
the parachute and causing a turn. I always use at least a
short bridle on my chutes.
Figure 3. Close up of a kit chute with the original lines
stripped from it and replaced by longer and more even
lines. Lines are taped in place then gathered together with
an overhand knot. Note also the short bridle.
These flights suggest that uneven lines can cause
corkscrew descents. They also show that it is possible that
kit chutes as supplied can avoid corkscrew descents if their
lines happened to be even enough and if the parachutes
are installed carefully on the nose cone. Finally they show
that replacing the lines with longer and more even lines can
help prevent corkscrew descents.
Prevention
(1) Most modelers tend to spend very little time on the
parachute since their only reason for using a chute is so
they can launch the rocket more than once. The chute is
often an afterthought for both modelers and some kit manufacturers. Take great care when assembling the chute.
Above all, make sure the lines are all long enough and of
the same length. If the chute comes preassembled and the
lines are uneven or too short, strip them from the canopy
and carefully install your own. I do this for all my kit chutes
anyway. See reference 3.
(2) Don’t connect the parachute directly to the nose
Figure 4. A small kit chute with a bridle installed between the
snap swivel and the “suspension line confluence” (where
the lines come together). This may prevent the parachute
from being affected by turbulence from the nose.
(3) Cut some holes in the chute. Cutting holes in the
chute increases what parachute experts call “geometric
porosity.” Increasing geometric porosity decreases a parachute’s tendency to glide all over the sky (there are some
exceptions.) Spill holes (technically called “apex vents”)
are nearly always a good idea. You can remove up to 25%
of a kit chute’s total area when making a spill hole although
it is probably not necessary to make one that large (see
reference 4)!
Continued on Page 5
https://www.apogeerockets.com/Rocket-Kits/Skill-Level-3-Model-Rocket-Kits/Zephyr
Page 4
Issue 607 / August 29th 2023
Corkscrew Parachute Descents
(And what to do about them)
By Dave Flanagan
References
1. Knacke, T. W., Parachute systems design manual,
NWC-TP-6575, March, 1991.
2. Stine, G. H., Handbook of model rocketry, 6th Ed.,
1994.
3. Flanagan, D. T., Upgrading Low Power Rocket Kit
parachutes. Peak of Flight #578, July 19, 2022.
https://www.apogeerockets.com/education/downloads/
Newsletter578.pdf
Figure 5. A kit chute with 25% of its area removed to make a
spill hole.
(4) Finally, you can modify a kit chute so it becomes a
different type of parachute altogether. An example is the
“ringslot” parachute. It is easy to make (even from a kit
chute that is already assembled), is very stable, opens very
softly, and doesn’t glide (see reference 5).
4. Flanagan, D. T., Maximum spill hole size in low power rocket parachutes. Peak of Flight #580, August 16, 2022.
https://www.apogeerockets.com/education/downloads/
Newsletter580.pdf
5. Flanagan, D. T., The ringslot parachute. Peak of
Flight #485, December 25, 2018.
https://www.apogeerockets.com/education/downloads/
Newsletter485.pdf
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank Mr. Steve Riegel of
Front Range Rocket Recovery for his input following a
review of the first draft of this article.
About the Author
Figure 6. A 12” kit chute modified into a “ringslot” parachute.
Remember that parachutes with holes in them generally descend faster, so it is possible you might want to go up
one size.
Investing just a little bit of extra care and attention to
your model’s parachute may let you get a lot more flights
out of it!
Dave is a registered professional engineer with over twenty
years of aerospace experience at NASA’s JSC and MSFC.
He holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in engineering and a B.S.
degree in science, and while at MSFC supported NASA’s
University Student Launch Initiative. He earned his airborne
wings in the Army and holds an expert skydiver rating from
the U.S. Parachute Association. Dave is an FAA master
parachute rigger and has completed the AIAA Parachute
Systems Technology Short Course. He is also a FAA
licensed private pilot and an EAA certified ultralight pilot.
Dave is retired and lives in the Missouri Ozarks where he
flies model rockets at a rural airport, usually ones recovered by really weird looking parachutes.
Have fun!
Join Tripoli.org
Mention Apogee Components
Page 5
Issue 607 / August 29th 2023
Escape Velocity Plan
By Martin Jay McKee
Escape Velocity Parts List
10086 - (1) AT-18/18” (6/pk) - 9” used
13028 - (1) CR-13/18 (6/pk) - 1 needed
14098 - (1) Balsa Sheet 1/16” x3” x 18” (1/pk)
BLUE - 5”x1.5” needed
19801 - (1) PNC-18B (3/pk) - 1 needed
30303 - (1) 2”x56” Mylar Streamer (2/pk) - 1
needed
30325 - (4) Kevlar Cord 100#
- Copy paper for fin skins
Download the RockSim design file for Escape Velocity at:
https://www.apogeerockets.com/Peak-of-Flight-Rocket-Plans
ESCAPE VELOCITY
Order parts at:
https://www.apogeerockets.com/Quick_Order
Recomended Motors
Estes 1/2 A6-2 - 189’ (58m) Single Use
Quest A3-4 - 561’ (171m) Single Use
Estes A8-3 - 564’ (172m) Single Use
Quest B4-6 - 1307’ (398m) Single Use
Estes B6-6 - 1184’ (361m) Single Use
Quest B6-6W - 1381’ (421m) Single Use
Estes C6-7 - 2224’ (678m) Single Use
Quest D20-8 - 2905’ (886m) Single Use
Aerotech D24-10 - 3647’ (1112m) Reloadable
Escape Velocity By Martin Jay McKee
Introduction:
The Escape Velocity is a simple rocket with
insane performance. Built light and launched
out of a tower (e.g. P/N 07696 https://www.
apogeerockets.com/Launch_Accessories/
Launch_Pads/Apogee_Competition_Launch_
Tower ), a composite Quest D20W will push this
rocket to just past the speed of sound (and to an altitude of nearly 3000’)! Building is exceptionally
easy, and the rocket can also be flown to impressive heights on even small motors. An Estes 1/2A6 will
send the Escape Velocity to 200’.
Continued on Page 7
While the Escape Velocity is a genuinely easy rocket to build, it provides an
excellent base for experimentation and development of skills.
Page 6
Issue 607 / August 29th 2023
Escape Velocity Plan
By Martin Jay McKee
Building Notes:
The fins on the Escape Velocity are constructed of thin wood and while they are sufficient for
A and B class motors without skins; for flights on C and D class motors, the fins should be papered
(hence the patterns being included in the plan).
The shock cord is mounted by being tied around the engine block before the engine block is
glued into place. It should be ensured that the shock cord is tightly secured to the ring before glue is
applied in the tube and the ring is inserted to act as an engine block.
For maximum altitude and velocity, the fins should be airfoiled and any step between the nose
cone and tube sanded smooth. Additionally, the surface of the rocket should be painted smooth using
a minimum of paint (to keep the weight down). The Escape Velocity is unlikely to break the speed of
sound if the completed empty weight is greater than 14 g (0.5 oz).
Decal (Print on Clear)
ESCAPE VELOCITY
Grain
Fin Skin Template
Fin Template
9in
228.6mm
0.063in
1.6mm
PNC-18B
A
100# Kevlar tied to
ring before
installation
2.5in
63.5mm
A
Streamer
1in
Continued on Page 8
Page 7